Do plasma phemonena account for many UFO/UAP sightings? This is not to suggest that something akin to ball lighting can explain all of them, but there are striking visual similarities to many eye witness reports.
The Safire Project / Aureon.ca (2021 update)
The real clean energy revolution is already underway. The Safire project has made remarkable progress, including the transmutation of elements! From the new web site Aureon.ca:
SAFIRE can create, control, contain, sustain, and repeat-at-will any number of plasma regimes. No other technology in the world can do this.
Seven years of empirical testing has resulted in a unique patented stable spherical "SAFIRE" plasma reactor. AUREON ENERGY LTD. will commercialize the SAFIRE technology into three key markets:
> clean energy production
> remediation of nuclear waste
Each market in itself represents a trillion dollar industry over the next ten years. AUREON ENERGY is currently engaging investors to commercialize the technology.
Rapid Luminosity changes! Black Hole or Plasma phenomenon?
We see compact energetic activity at the heart of galaxies. According to consensus science, this results from Black Holes - the famous mathematical points (abstractions) with zero volume and infinite mass. From a plasma perspective, of course, intense electromagnetic activity makes far more sense. See article below.
Further evidence for a plasmoid is now in! How can the corona of a 'black hole' lighten and darken in such a short space of time?
Only when the power supply varies, I would suggest.
"We expect that luminosity changes this big should vary on timescales of many thousands to millions of years," says Erin Kara, assistant professor of physics at MIT. "But in this object, we saw it change by 10,000 over a year, and it even changed by a factor of 100 in eight hours, which is just totally unheard of and really mind-boggling."
Black Hole pictured? 2019
A Black Hole has just been pictured for the first time, at least according to the spin. Conventional theory, of course, has it that nothing can escape the extreme gravitational pull on the other side of a hypothetical Event Horizon. Not even light, and that is why we haven't been able to see black holes ... up until now. So what has changed? And what exactly can we see now that we couldn't see before?
Well, the glowing elements pictured right are supposedly hot gases which have been compressed by the gravity and magnetic fields surrounding the alleged black hole at the centre of galaxy M87. Hey presto, a black hole has been pictured, or at least some of the excited matter surrounding it. Bear in mind, also, that the picture is actually a composite.
Those familiar with the content of this web site will, however, immediately recognise at least two problems with these claims. Number one, magnetic fields do not exist in isolation; they go hand in hand with electric currents in space, hence the term electromagnetism, and number two, gravity is not the only force active in space. In fact, space turns out to be alive with plasma and electromagnestism, and plasma is a state of matter quite different from a hot gas. Plasmas emit light when in more energetic glow mode. In other words, a plasmoid has been pictured.
See the Technical II page of this site for an explanation of one type of Plasmoid, the Plasma Gun, and the Mathematics page for a straightforward debunking of the nonsensical mathematics on which Black Hole theory rests and falls. According to black hole advocates, the finite mass of a black hole is concentrated into a physical 'singularity' of zero volume, infinite density, and infinite gravity. But no finite mass has zero volume, infinite density, and infinite gravity. This is a mathematical abstraction with no basis in reality.
It is important to understand that Gravitational theory invoked Black Holes to compensate for the shortfall in observed mass required to hold galaxies together. No doubt the pictures will help theorists obtain further funding.
People often say I will believe it when I see it, but it seems some people are more likely to see what they believe.
Did you know? In a 1939 paper in the Annals of Mathematics Einstein concluded that the Black Hole hypothesis was 'not convincing' and the phenomena did not exist 'in the real world'! How often do you hear this from consensus sources?
"Gravitational systems are the ashes of prior electrical systems." Hannes Alfvén
"It is easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled." Anon
The NASA spacecraft, IBEX, has recently
discovered another shock for the mainstream, if you'll
pardon the pun, yet again. Researchers describe it as
a ribbon of highly energetic particles at
the boundary of our solar system, and it has them puzzled.
measure and count particles known as energetic neutral
atoms. These arise from an area called the interstellar
boundary. This zone, undetectable by normal telescopes,
is where electrically charged particles flowing from
the sun, called the solar wind, pass far beyond the
planets and plow into the gas and dust of the larger
to see small, gradual spatial variations
at the interstellar boundary,
McComas told physicsworld.com, a website
of the London-based Institute of Physics.
Scientists think the finding doesnt
fit with the accepted model of the heliosphere,
thought to be shaped like a comet by the collision
of the outgoing solar wind and a greater
Though I tire of saying it, these mysterious
ribbons are expected and predicted by the plasma model.
In this particular case, these filaments clearly connect
our solar system with the electrical supply of the wider
The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no
evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd; indeed
in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind,
a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than
sensible." Bertrand Russell
Young Galaxies Have Surprisingly Strong
Magnetic Fields: Contradicts Popular Theories
(July 26, 2008)"The origin
of magnetic fields in galaxies is still a mystery to
astronomers. Popular theories suggest continual strengthening
over billions of years. The latest results from Simon
Lillys group, however, contradict this assumption
and reveal that young galaxies also have strong magnetic
If only the astronomical community would listen to
Nobel Laureate, Hannes Alfvén, who explained
that magnetic fields cannot be viewed in isolation.
Electric Currents and Magnetic Fields go hand in hand.
"The first principle is that you must not fool
yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."
Richard P. Feynman
Galaxies like beads on a necklacead
Another successful prediction of the plasma model.
Astronomers find that galaxies are not oriented randomly
"...Trujillo's team found that significantly
more spiral galaxies spin with their axes aligned with
the filaments they are embedded in than would be expected
What is making NASA's twin Pioneer
spacecraft mysteriously drift off course, apparently
defying the laws of physics? Pioneer 10 and 11 were
launched in the early 1970s and explored the outer solar
system, but in 1980 mission scientists noticed that
the spacecraft have drifted off course by hunderds of
thousands of kilometres.
Both spacecraft have been pulled
a little harder than expected towards the sun since
their launch. In addition to possible technical explanations,
engineers are now having to consider the possibility
of a breakdown in our understanding of gravity!
Huge Auroras on Jupiters
Jupiter's X-ray Auroras have been dubbed
'Northern Lights on steroids'. They're hundreds of times
more energetic than auroras here on Earth! NASA
Io and Jupiter are connected by a 'flux tube' that
contains an electric current of at least 5,000,000 amps
generating trillions of watts of power! From Solarviews.com
As early as 1979 this paper
speculated that the eruptions on Io were driven by electrical
phenomena! This EU idea is still anathema to the mainstream.
By isolating the brightest parts
of the flash in each frame, colourising the results,
and superimposing them in pairs, it is possible
to see how the flash moved over time. The result
strongly supports the pre-impact flash hypothesis
of EU theorists.
It will be interesting to
see how NASA explain this.
men really want is not knowledge but certainty."
According to conventional wisdom, comets are left over
from the formation of our solar system. Expectations
in this regard have shaped our theories, but the trouble
is that ongoing discoveries continually challenge the
'Dirty Snowball' model. The copper projectile, Deep
impact, was recently crashed into comet Tempel 1 and
the results have produced further 'big surprises', although
they lend strong support to EU theories, and were in
fact predicted by Wal Thornhill. See links below.
NASA scientists were astonished and expressed their
amazement on camera and in no uncertain terms: "The
blast was considerably more energetic than I expected...,
The big question is how did we make such a big
splash..., Im at a loss to explain
The results still require further analysis, and this
could take some time, but the bright and frequent outflarings,
together with the much brighter than expected pre-impact
and impact flashes strongly support EU predictions.
An additional electrical component to comets would explain
Moreover, little ice/water has thus far been detected
from the impact. In a splendid display of sophistry,
some in the mainstream have now re-dubbed comets as
'Snowy Dirtballs' and even 'Powdery Fluffballs'. Whatever
next? Giant balls of cheese?
"...'If astronomy were a science,'as
one astronomer put it, theoreticians would admit that
the theory had been falsified, and they would start
over with an eye to the evidence. Instead, they hang
on to the theory with ever more stubbornness and hope
a little tinkering and adjusting will bring the facts
For the latest news on Electric Universe matters go
It is updated with fascinating articles on a daily basis.
Electricity in the mainstream, shock
In an interesting development, a recent
article talks in terms of enormous voltages. Such a reference
to electrical phenomena in space is rare indeed from mainstream
sources, and should be seen as positive progress.
travel is utter bilge." Richard Wooley, U.K. Astronomer
The high-voltage environment of one of
the most energetic and strongly magnetized pulsars known
has been surveyed by NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory.
A team of astronomers found a powerful jet of high-energy
particles extending over a distance of 20 light years
and bright arcs believed to be due to particles of matter
and anti-matter generated by the pulsar."
Normal Service is resumed
There is an interesting lead article
in the April 2005 edition of Scientific American. It
is entitled 'Probing the Geodynamo', and it focuses
on the magnetic field lines generated by the Earth's
'internal dynamo', and the difficulties in measuring
these fields. The dynamo driving these fields is the
the relative movement of electrically conducting fluids
at the Earth's core. It also speculates about the possible
cause of polarity changes, which are known to have happened.
However, there is no mention of electric
currents or plasma in space, or any potential interaction
between space plasmas and the earth's geodynamo and
magnetic field lines. Worse still, that dreaded term
favoured by the mainstream raises its head. The article
says: "We can think of these lines of force as
being 'frozen in'..."
The term 'frozen-in' is debunked in the
technical section of this site.
"What I am going to tell you
about is what we teach our physics students in the third
or fourth year of graduate school... It is my task to
convince you not to turn away because you don't understand
it. You see my physics students don't understand it...
That is because I don't understand it." Richard